Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 00:24:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57077492EA977716850AD08910879F0A856FB9689F84F4AB6D1BD46D5EACD3AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The problem is purposefully written ambiguously in order to drive social media engagement. To unambiguously write the problem, another set of parentheses is required: (6/2)*(1+2)=9 6/(2*(1+2))=1 Reporting from a previous time such an equation was circulated: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/science/math-equation-pemdas.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632878581192998913
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57077492EA977716850AD08910879F0A856FB9689F84F4AB6D1BD46D5EACD3AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1678148640328
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163287858119299891357077492EA977716850AD08910879F0A856FB9689F84F4AB6D1BD46D5EACD3AD