Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 17:59:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Initially the cycle threshold values were running at a higher amount (40-45) which caused false positives. Later the cycle threshold value consensus was decreased to 33 (CDC) or 35 (Dr. Fauci) rather than a potentially misleading 40 or 45. https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90508 https://web.archive.org/web/20230101181315/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1632581474355486723
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
createdAtMillis - 1704650379139
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 163258147435548672377F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C