Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-05 04:53:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9212F44BED3F3EAD3C3F479FFAD87690C7CBD4BDD44A50FDF63B13BBA4E1B11F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is this person's opinion on the case. Nothing suggests they don't understand the self-defense veredict. People can and do frequently express their frustration towards juridical decisions they disagree with. Needs no note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632194773485338624
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9212F44BED3F3EAD3C3F479FFAD87690C7CBD4BDD44A50FDF63B13BBA4E1B11F
  • createdAtMillis - 1677992010124
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16321947734853386249212F44BED3F3EAD3C3F479FFAD87690C7CBD4BDD44A50FDF63B13BBA4E1B11F