Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-04 23:29:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98DDA29E9E65E6BB77C3DFC8C929F41AE51591470940B0CE9AAECD60167B4FFE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet expresses an opinion about how to interpret the video. Readers can watch the video for themselves to see if they agree with the interpretation. The opinion isn’t unreasonable. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632154396422459392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98DDA29E9E65E6BB77C3DFC8C929F41AE51591470940B0CE9AAECD60167B4FFE
  • createdAtMillis - 1677972590356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163215439642245939298DDA29E9E65E6BB77C3DFC8C929F41AE51591470940B0CE9AAECD60167B4FFE