Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-28 15:01:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF07F60282EF7E69054F7C986F0F96D16613F2218CCF5BC85258A5A06F9B8B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no claim in this tweet that Fauci profited by personally holding a patent. The tweet clearly states, “Fauci’s agency.” As he was the director of that agency, and the agency benefitted from the patents, the tweet is factual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630576072566644736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF07F60282EF7E69054F7C986F0F96D16613F2218CCF5BC85258A5A06F9B8B32
  • createdAtMillis - 1677596504023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1630576072566644736BF07F60282EF7E69054F7C986F0F96D16613F2218CCF5BC85258A5A06F9B8B32