Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-28 16:28:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C59BD019FC1D2ABC3F904EFC7490258F98F037AB9DC0851A7248799643036D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no claim in this tweet that Fauci profited by personally holding a patent. The tweet clearly states, “Fauci’s agency.” As he was the director of that agency, and the agency benefitted from the patents, the tweet is factual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630576072566644736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C59BD019FC1D2ABC3F904EFC7490258F98F037AB9DC0851A7248799643036D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1677601708864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16305760725666447363C59BD019FC1D2ABC3F904EFC7490258F98F037AB9DC0851A7248799643036D5