Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-28 16:38:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2633DA446F03B05DFBBA4CC891487F0F3B293CFF0DD3F5C157C7A697F87D129F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no claim in this tweet that Fauci profited by personally holding a patent. The tweet clearly states, “Fauci’s agency.” As he was the director of that agency, and the agency benefitted from the patents, the tweet is factual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630576072566644736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2633DA446F03B05DFBBA4CC891487F0F3B293CFF0DD3F5C157C7A697F87D129F
  • createdAtMillis - 1677602324688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16305760725666447362633DA446F03B05DFBBA4CC891487F0F3B293CFF0DD3F5C157C7A697F87D129F