Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-28 18:21:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C7E839644954F87C47111ED6AB550BAA920E6C2F8E3D02910ECD0B8D3A88C2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no claim in this tweet that Fauci profited by personally holding a patent. The tweet clearly states, “Fauci’s agency.” As he was the director of that agency, and the agency benefitted from the patents, the tweet is factual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630576072566644736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C7E839644954F87C47111ED6AB550BAA920E6C2F8E3D02910ECD0B8D3A88C2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1677608478046
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16305760725666447360C7E839644954F87C47111ED6AB550BAA920E6C2F8E3D02910ECD0B8D3A88C2B