Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 18:57:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83601C99575B7D1F167543D60E84D13445BB20FCDF04F992998EB1C191656021
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is expressing an opinion; this is a common interpretation of the Second Amendment. No note needed, as it is not making misleading claims about what the Supreme Court has held.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630278329398882305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83601C99575B7D1F167543D60E84D13445BB20FCDF04F992998EB1C191656021
  • createdAtMillis - 1677524267486
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163027832939888230583601C99575B7D1F167543D60E84D13445BB20FCDF04F992998EB1C191656021