Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 05:45:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8D823C2433C8AFB8574A4C6E5F62F1D2A941413FFC773B832B5C6EA1A300B07
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim being made here is simply that it was inappropriate for corporations to censor a perfectly reasonable opinion--one that is now favored by the Dept. of Energy. No claim is being made that it is definitely correct. No note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630032911826132992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8D823C2433C8AFB8574A4C6E5F62F1D2A941413FFC773B832B5C6EA1A300B07
  • createdAtMillis - 1677476718900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1630032911826132992A8D823C2433C8AFB8574A4C6E5F62F1D2A941413FFC773B832B5C6EA1A300B07