Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 17:50:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96D8EFE8E244D5AEC2D5C7B4F4E9B54000D8668F09345C7F5AF108FED3E31310
Participant Details

Original Note:

While individual opinions about the proper reading of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution differ widely, and have for generations, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that it does protect an individual right to bear arms (with certain limitations). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630018506224721920
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96D8EFE8E244D5AEC2D5C7B4F4E9B54000D8668F09345C7F5AF108FED3E31310
  • createdAtMillis - 1677520211647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 163001850622472192096D8EFE8E244D5AEC2D5C7B4F4E9B54000D8668F09345C7F5AF108FED3E31310