Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 18:06:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E7E9C8303D30B64FE7F0C873D8B931C2E45CCD69728C3EE4C9A4B8B5C073C8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While individual opinions about the proper reading of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution differ widely, and have for generations, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that it does protect an individual right to bear arms (with certain limitations). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630018506224721920
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E7E9C8303D30B64FE7F0C873D8B931C2E45CCD69728C3EE4C9A4B8B5C073C8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1677521164648
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16300185062247219202E7E9C8303D30B64FE7F0C873D8B931C2E45CCD69728C3EE4C9A4B8B5C073C8D