Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 04:02:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EBAE71E500CDB69A04A9DB075C38AC80167FABB0A49E1A5A7D0EAA81F428E33
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aside from this agency saying they had "low confidence" more agencies said it did not come from the lab https://twitter.com/JChengWSJ/status/1629821329510916101?t=tcb6YtFlYLWRwG7QhCTpSQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629924282322284544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EBAE71E500CDB69A04A9DB075C38AC80167FABB0A49E1A5A7D0EAA81F428E33
  • createdAtMillis - 1717041756250
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16299242823222845441EBAE71E500CDB69A04A9DB075C38AC80167FABB0A49E1A5A7D0EAA81F428E33