Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 00:11:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9D2C4B5CD0BF9FD1F2EBB6D9E675E831137830CF562F287803C863DA8953D35
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet presents as a statement of fact. Contrary argument is properly conducted in the Comments. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629922953793093637
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9D2C4B5CD0BF9FD1F2EBB6D9E675E831137830CF562F287803C863DA8953D35
  • createdAtMillis - 1677456661092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1629922953793093637A9D2C4B5CD0BF9FD1F2EBB6D9E675E831137830CF562F287803C863DA8953D35