Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-26 16:54:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CC5EC4B68093A168182E2BE7E0E2459B5B2B60F8AA53E7A31ED623703020938
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a network news broadcast with a doctor expressing his opinion about a study that exists. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v2 Many doctors disagree with each other and the validity of various studies. People can debate whether it is a good or bad study in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629885426168217601
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CC5EC4B68093A168182E2BE7E0E2459B5B2B60F8AA53E7A31ED623703020938
  • createdAtMillis - 1677430490795
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16298854261682176018CC5EC4B68093A168182E2BE7E0E2459B5B2B60F8AA53E7A31ED623703020938