Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 15:32:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4850B1AB3AACE8E2C7335AA377F8C481F3712D045F95C81EB5FDBD905049C5C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Did you just fact check the WSJ with the WSJ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629882278225539072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4850B1AB3AACE8E2C7335AA377F8C481F3712D045F95C81EB5FDBD905049C5C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1677511967760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16298822782255390724850B1AB3AACE8E2C7335AA377F8C481F3712D045F95C81EB5FDBD905049C5C5