Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-25 14:49:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2548D860D067A83A6ADB796A9EF1AA45BDDEFDC4F9AA4B8A3CE733A7A1EBBFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The information provided is factually correct and in full context. The other notes cited studies are not related to mask efficacy. 1-3,5, and 7 are related to mask *mandates*, not the efficacy of masks when used properly. 4th is commentary. 6 and 9 are preprints on mandates.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629235794497110016
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2548D860D067A83A6ADB796A9EF1AA45BDDEFDC4F9AA4B8A3CE733A7A1EBBFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1677336546031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1629235794497110016C2548D860D067A83A6ADB796A9EF1AA45BDDEFDC4F9AA4B8A3CE733A7A1EBBFF