Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-23 04:21:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4005F432F49A0C28DF1D46B7FBD0A2E62112213B49EDA6C3FF94F202ADAE03DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

In order to decipher such accurate statistics, one must have access to at least 51% of all the tweets, an unbiased AI to go through the data, in a time frame long enough to be refelective. No such evidence is provided. Tweet is propaganda

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1628543975639646209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4005F432F49A0C28DF1D46B7FBD0A2E62112213B49EDA6C3FF94F202ADAE03DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1677126063884
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16285439756396462094005F432F49A0C28DF1D46B7FBD0A2E62112213B49EDA6C3FF94F202ADAE03DB