Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-22 02:13:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CA3D9538C89B331F66A0F7620DA57303DC77F9CBCBB7E278254BE4BB8540521
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Original Tweet is correct. The Note linking to the Local paper is unneeded and should be in the replies of the OT.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1628166256707702787
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1CA3D9538C89B331F66A0F7620DA57303DC77F9CBCBB7E278254BE4BB8540521
  • createdAtMillis - 1677032029190
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16281662567077027871CA3D9538C89B331F66A0F7620DA57303DC77F9CBCBB7E278254BE4BB8540521