Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-20 22:30:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84C5ACAEAF8E52E377040A339D474A1339B06FD1E4A87C4BE636EC8D2A7210CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

based on information available at the time, the Tweet in question was accurate. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3777268 the statistics available now would be very different based on data against current strains, availability, uptake, etc, but the Tweet in question was accurate at the time and has aged.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627661860978696193
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84C5ACAEAF8E52E377040A339D474A1339B06FD1E4A87C4BE636EC8D2A7210CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1676932225209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162766186097869619384C5ACAEAF8E52E377040A339D474A1339B06FD1E4A87C4BE636EC8D2A7210CE