Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-20 18:17:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FE67CB2ABDCC27925D00F2096B3E4466CB8367A37BC30EBC82E79855F9A1EF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

based on information available at the time, the Tweet in question was accurate. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3777268 the statistics available now would be very different based on data against current strains, availability, uptake, etc, but the Tweet in question was accurate at the time and has aged.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627661860978696193
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FE67CB2ABDCC27925D00F2096B3E4466CB8367A37BC30EBC82E79855F9A1EF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1676917074886
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16276618609786961934FE67CB2ABDCC27925D00F2096B3E4466CB8367A37BC30EBC82E79855F9A1EF9