Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-20 15:38:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 306516AD8A0AA2311A01D3CB52347595CC6071ED81795CAC26E617A9F2392262
Participant Details

Original Note:

based on information available at the time, the Tweet in question was accurate. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3777268 the statistics available now would be very different based on data against current strains, availability, uptake, etc, but the Tweet in question was accurate at the time and has aged.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627661860978696193
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 306516AD8A0AA2311A01D3CB52347595CC6071ED81795CAC26E617A9F2392262
  • createdAtMillis - 1676907509546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1627661860978696193306516AD8A0AA2311A01D3CB52347595CC6071ED81795CAC26E617A9F2392262