Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-20 18:40:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09AE73946AB32F4C78F8F399EF60E2DDD4D5321F24F6CCA17C05F7A5B042F3DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

based on information available at the time, the Tweet in question was accurate. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3777268 the statistics available now would be very different based on data against current strains, availability, uptake, etc, but the Tweet in question was accurate at the time and has aged.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627661860978696193
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09AE73946AB32F4C78F8F399EF60E2DDD4D5321F24F6CCA17C05F7A5B042F3DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1676918412650
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 162766186097869619309AE73946AB32F4C78F8F399EF60E2DDD4D5321F24F6CCA17C05F7A5B042F3DB