Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 16:37:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D64EE3A21177F2BDC568FAA84472C909C062B57A8A1B54FB89FB669C669DD0A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter should not have been vetting tweets and tweeters for King. His staff could have verified if those tweets came from constituents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627277718474694664
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D64EE3A21177F2BDC568FAA84472C909C062B57A8A1B54FB89FB669C669DD0A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1676824655204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1627277718474694664D64EE3A21177F2BDC568FAA84472C909C062B57A8A1B54FB89FB669C669DD0A7