Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 15:19:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 477CA9FBBD7C32791D54E36911724C598E1E582FD030D7174A66E87FABAB0D1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter should not have been vetting tweets and tweeters for King. His staff could have verified if those tweets came from constituents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627277718474694664
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 477CA9FBBD7C32791D54E36911724C598E1E582FD030D7174A66E87FABAB0D1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1676819998479
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1627277718474694664477CA9FBBD7C32791D54E36911724C598E1E582FD030D7174A66E87FABAB0D1F