Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 11:13:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F029B1ADF2A19FC640B0E97BD21E3B2C87C02D8F8CC218EA4E84F6E4588BB470
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above claims that evidence “discredits” her story. That is biased language, implying that the woman here is lying. Linking to the text of state law does not support that subjective value judgement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627217107954896897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F029B1ADF2A19FC640B0E97BD21E3B2C87C02D8F8CC218EA4E84F6E4588BB470
  • createdAtMillis - 1676805211826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1627217107954896897F029B1ADF2A19FC640B0E97BD21E3B2C87C02D8F8CC218EA4E84F6E4588BB470