Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 08:10:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED9C94DD3CEC0D4DD0F3AD0FEC7FE6650A3E2FF3C8DFC589C67CC013E8F33E68
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above claims that evidence “discredits” her story. That is biased language, implying that the woman here is lying. Linking to the text of state law does not support that subjective value judgement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627217107954896897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED9C94DD3CEC0D4DD0F3AD0FEC7FE6650A3E2FF3C8DFC589C67CC013E8F33E68
  • createdAtMillis - 1676794202452
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1627217107954896897ED9C94DD3CEC0D4DD0F3AD0FEC7FE6650A3E2FF3C8DFC589C67CC013E8F33E68