Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 19:14:45 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4EA0D6D6B2936D92FBC7EB9E558200B10B94CB2A72E028E81C956B4F686B0DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above claims that evidence “discredits” her story. That is biased language, implying that the woman here is lying. Linking to the text of state law does not support that subjective value judgement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627217107954896897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4EA0D6D6B2936D92FBC7EB9E558200B10B94CB2A72E028E81C956B4F686B0DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1676834085009
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1627217107954896897C4EA0D6D6B2936D92FBC7EB9E558200B10B94CB2A72E028E81C956B4F686B0DE