Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-18 19:36:22 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F3FEEEA4B65ED345DAE872C369EBD16D567DEAC24EF4BC2780EA275F1673238
Participant Details

Original Note:

Numerous court decisions have found otherwise: "Given the publisher’s First Amendment rights, issues of what is published and not published are not generally a “legitimate employee concern[]” for purposes of § 7’s protection." https://www.laborrelationsupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2012/12/Ampersand-Publishing-LLC-v.-NLRB-D.C.-Cir.-December-18-2012.pdf See also: Passaic Daily News v. NLRB https://casetext.com/case/passaic-daily-news-v-nlrb

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627027689256235009
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F3FEEEA4B65ED345DAE872C369EBD16D567DEAC24EF4BC2780EA275F1673238
  • createdAtMillis - 1676748982552
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16270276892562350095F3FEEEA4B65ED345DAE872C369EBD16D567DEAC24EF4BC2780EA275F1673238