Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-18 02:13:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DA04521E5F779D5C71BA693DB20C3DC536D4C5D0B93050A0BF360BC82E4CFDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note misstates the information in the NYT piece, which does not establish that regulations rolled back under Trump would not have applied in this case. Tweet is personal opinion and rhetoric regardless. Argue in the thread, not in a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1626658159367446531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DA04521E5F779D5C71BA693DB20C3DC536D4C5D0B93050A0BF360BC82E4CFDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1676686389010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16266581593674465318DA04521E5F779D5C71BA693DB20C3DC536D4C5D0B93050A0BF360BC82E4CFDF