Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-17 20:42:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 320A35843DAD5F74DAE8BBD641FA44322B8433B463A4779C709CF3D8ABBC1855
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note misstates the information in the NYT piece, which does not establish that regulations rolled back under Trump would not have applied in this case. Tweet is personal opinion and rhetoric regardless. Argue in the thread, not in a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1626658159367446531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 320A35843DAD5F74DAE8BBD641FA44322B8433B463A4779C709CF3D8ABBC1855
  • createdAtMillis - 1676666564394
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1626658159367446531320A35843DAD5F74DAE8BBD641FA44322B8433B463A4779C709CF3D8ABBC1855