Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-17 21:38:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A21645CA58CE44923062E8CD4B085CABED347B252C2E0B344152721428A9489
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is misleading and unnecessary. Carlson's comments in private were much clearer and harsher than his public comments; regardless, the note author is arguing with an implication they read into the tweet, not the tweet itself--which is entirely factual and accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1626655161350295552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8A21645CA58CE44923062E8CD4B085CABED347B252C2E0B344152721428A9489
  • createdAtMillis - 1676669891595
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16266551613502955528A21645CA58CE44923062E8CD4B085CABED347B252C2E0B344152721428A9489