Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 06:52:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FF87AB8F13179C310A64922502550AF15A1A6D2436060016BCC7B1EE96200A99
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details