Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 02:07:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DAE8BFCD9E84CE8003E70259FFFB6E73FA1F6676EFD0CB0E4830F142D02D5965
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details