Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 21:04:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C67398AE9626659CE4D2EC0C2BF0F200A32C3EBFFF3E5A9A964AE6504F9D469C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details