Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 16:29:59 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A1BC67BAA1C45A0145A6D7CA156674959BE7015BB83DD9E443FEDE0D02FC72BA
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details