Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 05:48:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 39D79573D7CD3B42749CE8FF27E0AB535D73B269FAD2279732E563AAB41334A5
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details