Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 20:42:31 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 320A35843DAD5F74DAE8BBD641FA44322B8433B463A4779C709CF3D8ABBC1855
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details