Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 16:38:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2E9BC3AFE0638469863C0E328FD503028E63FB572042B2377943613774B498C4
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details