Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 04:37:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 19BE9B37BA723A4D2D8A05AF7F0CAF112680CB3B9F95157926C6C798CA39D87F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details