Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 05:55:19 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 078B5B724B3B144230485C9A5F290453633645E4A17ECB18156C01F88418E1CD
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details