Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-17 00:41:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F3FEEEA4B65ED345DAE872C369EBD16D567DEAC24EF4BC2780EA275F1673238
Participant Details

Original Note:

The initial decision was later overturned on appeal. The Employment Tribunal ultimately found Maya Forstater had suffered direct discrimination because of her beliefs. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62c57e5ce90e07748814bc8d/Ms_M_Forstater__vs_Cgd_Europe_and_Others.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1626359587719770112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F3FEEEA4B65ED345DAE872C369EBD16D567DEAC24EF4BC2780EA275F1673238
  • createdAtMillis - 1676594469800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16263595877197701125F3FEEEA4B65ED345DAE872C369EBD16D567DEAC24EF4BC2780EA275F1673238