Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-17 02:55:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37833E908A8F9F7E3EF893E48A85482702C5D75DB892B9708A95C4287D502026
Participant Details

Original Note:

The initial decision was later overturned on appeal. The Employment Tribunal ultimately found Maya Forstater had suffered direct discrimination because of her beliefs. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62c57e5ce90e07748814bc8d/Ms_M_Forstater__vs_Cgd_Europe_and_Others.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1626359587719770112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37833E908A8F9F7E3EF893E48A85482702C5D75DB892B9708A95C4287D502026
  • createdAtMillis - 1676602532248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162635958771977011237833E908A8F9F7E3EF893E48A85482702C5D75DB892B9708A95C4287D502026