Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-14 20:12:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9692357929540D5E7A923D6ABA7F8E2FB4E51D5FBAEE8D584B35B667111BFAB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an example of moral hazard which is well documented and real, is different from "dependency", and forms an entire field of economic study. The mind reels at the sheer number of possible citations, so we'll just use this one: https://www.nber.org/papers/w3316

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625586742139969540
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9692357929540D5E7A923D6ABA7F8E2FB4E51D5FBAEE8D584B35B667111BFAB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1676405530804
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16255867421399695409692357929540D5E7A923D6ABA7F8E2FB4E51D5FBAEE8D584B35B667111BFAB1