Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-14 21:15:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 212D21AB6C192B78D8A735E10F45966D171A4F2F2F2F97116E61F6C7A682CCCF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an example of moral hazard which is well documented and real, is different from "dependency", and forms an entire field of economic study. The mind reels at the sheer number of possible citations, so we'll just use this one: https://www.nber.org/papers/w3316

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625586742139969540
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 212D21AB6C192B78D8A735E10F45966D171A4F2F2F2F97116E61F6C7A682CCCF
  • createdAtMillis - 1676409318743
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1625586742139969540212D21AB6C192B78D8A735E10F45966D171A4F2F2F2F97116E61F6C7A682CCCF