Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-14 20:30:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22E9DF3F37DE5C5B9F2E7E95D1BD4E088C8BE6CD06DBFD0030F5A95F11447B0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet appears to be factually correct. Commenters wishing to detract from the author's point by adding irrelevant context should do so in replies to them, not by dropping unnecessary notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625581093872193536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22E9DF3F37DE5C5B9F2E7E95D1BD4E088C8BE6CD06DBFD0030F5A95F11447B0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1676406649884
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162558109387219353622E9DF3F37DE5C5B9F2E7E95D1BD4E088C8BE6CD06DBFD0030F5A95F11447B0D