Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-13 23:15:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFC824E57B6B91371D7C3BFCF01F8A2E9F5010F838C083C5AF6911F814E670B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet makes limited factual claims, which are correct. It's primarily a statement of opinion, which does not warrant a note. This note also misrepresents the "risk" to anyone, the notice to journalists, and the basis for the challenged bans.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625272077459521541
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFC824E57B6B91371D7C3BFCF01F8A2E9F5010F838C083C5AF6911F814E670B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1676330148521
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1625272077459521541EFC824E57B6B91371D7C3BFCF01F8A2E9F5010F838C083C5AF6911F814E670B1