Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-13 11:23:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73B1DB7401E0F0494D5E02502027FA8E00B3D31FDECE2152AEAE6AE1618BAA02
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet did not suggest the DOJ had the "authority to seize such data for political purposes", nor did it claim such a seizure could be done without a warrant. Your note is arguing against a claim that has not been asserted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625036653050953728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73B1DB7401E0F0494D5E02502027FA8E00B3D31FDECE2152AEAE6AE1618BAA02
  • createdAtMillis - 1676287395733
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162503665305095372873B1DB7401E0F0494D5E02502027FA8E00B3D31FDECE2152AEAE6AE1618BAA02