Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-12 05:02:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 917B073EFFAE3B924424C7D7E89AB9031E4237769FF55DC098E95513958A0FA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Study doesn’t need peer reviewing because it only used reviewed studies: “No new data were generated for this study. Source global sequencing data were available from GISAID (epicov.org) & INSDC via GenBank: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/. AGILE2 genomic data pub. in https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-34839-9 & deposited at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA854613 from which we analysed it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624603979434049537
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 917B073EFFAE3B924424C7D7E89AB9031E4237769FF55DC098E95513958A0FA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1676178143024
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1624603979434049537917B073EFFAE3B924424C7D7E89AB9031E4237769FF55DC098E95513958A0FA6