Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-12 14:08:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84239EAF6EDA9480C8E91F4C1AE8120018ABF37E4E3F6A3DDF8DF1A5CD8E12E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is purely personal opinion with no reference to any disputable facts, note not needed An almost identical note by the same author appears in the preceeding tweet Note spam which verges on harassment is categorically not the purpose of Community Notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624449993166950402
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84239EAF6EDA9480C8E91F4C1AE8120018ABF37E4E3F6A3DDF8DF1A5CD8E12E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1676210906040
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162444999316695040284239EAF6EDA9480C8E91F4C1AE8120018ABF37E4E3F6A3DDF8DF1A5CD8E12E9